Greg Stark <gsst...@mit.edu> writes: > On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 4:29 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Namely, that when reindexing an >> existing index, there cannot be any need to advance the index's >> indcheckxmin horizon.
> Note that if isvalid is not set then we don't know anything about the > hot chains since the concurrent index build never finished. Hmm, good point. We can probably handle this by tweaking the logic in reindex_index that changes indisvalid so that it will force indcheckxmin on when indisvalid had been false and there were any possibly-broken HOT chains. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers