On tor, 2011-04-21 at 22:17 +0100, Greg Stark wrote: > However your theory was all predicated on the idea that supporting 8.2 > was not much incremental effort and Dave said that's not true so this > is all moot. Doing it Windows-excluded seems not worth the effort --- > unless... what version of Postgres was shipped in the last supported > releases of major distributions? I think it was 8.1 in Ubuntu Hardy > and 8.4 in Ubuntu Lucid so that's irrelevant. What about Redhat and > Debian?
Debian: 8.3 in oldstable (<1 year left), 8.4 in stable, probably 9.1 in next -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
