"Kevin Grittner" <kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov> writes:
> Merlin Moncure <mmonc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> wouldn't it be better if the current crop of language handlers
>> could run procedures without major changes? C functions with SPI?
>> However it's internally implemented, the more userland mindspace
>> recovered for use of writing procedures the better off we are.
> +1
I'd like a pony, too. Let's be perfectly clear about this: there is no
part of plpgsql that can run outside a transaction today, and probably
no part of the other PLs either, and changing that "without major
changes" is wishful thinking of the first order.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
