On ons, 2011-04-27 at 19:17 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 18:55, Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote: > > On tis, 2011-03-29 at 23:48 +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > >> The line I marked in pg_basebackup.c might be an actual problem: It > >> goes through a whole lot to figure out the timeline and then doesn't > >> do anything with it. > > > > This hasn't been addressed yet. It doesn't manifest itself as an actual > > problem, but it looks as though someone had intended something in that > > code and the code doesn't do that. > > Do you have a ref to the actual problem? The subject change killed my > threading, the email was trimmed to not include the actual problem, > and it appears not to be listed on the open items list... ;)
In BaseBackup(), the variable timeline is assigned in a somewhat elaborate fashion, but then the result is not used for anything. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
