On 04/28/2011 12:44 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan<and...@dunslane.net>  writes:
What I'm thinking of doing is to set up something like:
     #define PG_PRINTF_CHECK __printf__
BTW, gcc 2.95.3 documents "printf", and not "__printf__".
Suggest not including the underscores, since that's apparently a
johnny-come-lately spelling.  It's not like any of this construct
is even faintly portable to non-gcc compilers anyway ...


Yeah, I think that the underscore variants got added because of cases like ours where printf is sometimes defined as a macro. I'll just need to make sure that this gets set before there's any possibility of that happening.

cheers

andrew

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to