Joshua Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> wrote: > Generally the last week only has 1-3 patches open The last CF I managed the end of the third week looked like this: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-08/msg00334.php That is, we had 15 patches still pending out of 72 submitted: 9 ready for committer 1 waiting on author 5 needing review If you want to view it as a *commit* fest, that is really 15 to go. If you're viewing it as a *review* fest, those six broke down: 3 were patches submitted by committers (1 of which was WIP) 1 other was WIP 1 was down to tweaking docs 1 got a review the next day, showing it wasn't ready So we either need to markedly increase the pace of CFs (which is hard without more reviewers unless we provide "brisker" review and kick things back a lot faster) or we need to stop thinking that the goal is to get them *committed* during the CommitFest; but I thought that was kinda the point. -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
