On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Gilberto Castillo Martínez <gilberto.casti...@etecsa.cu> wrote: > Josh, > > This would imply improvement in the terms of the U.S. embargo on Cuba. > > What would be real beneficial to all regional communities.
I wouldn't get overly optimistic about that - the purpose of this is a bit less "sweeping" than you may be thinking. The trademarks and domain names that exist are already, today, held in Canada, so this isn't a "move of everything to Canada." If the corporation became *really active* in extra senses (e.g. - handling donations, operating events), that would add some Canadian activity that doesn't exist today, but it's not clear that it would necessarily get "really active" that way. And it is quite possible that such activity would be pretty Canada-specific, as the legalities of doing things in foreign countries are always discouragingly complicated. Adding regional activity is typically a good thing, but trying to cross borders is always a complicating factor, even under ideal circumstances. -- When confronted by a difficult problem, solve it by reducing it to the question, "How would the Lone Ranger handle this?" -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
