On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 4:13 AM, Leonardo Francalanci <m_li...@yahoo.it> wrote: >> Maybe you should change xl_act_commit to have a separate list of rels to >> drop the init fork for (instead of mixing those with the list of files to >> drop as a whole). > > I tried to follow your suggestion, thank you very much.
I have to admit I don't like this approach very much. I can't see adding 4 bytes to every commit record for this feature. > 3) Should we have a "cascade" option? I don't know if I have to handle > inherited tables and other dependent objects Look at the way ALTER TABLE [ONLY] works for other action types, and copy it. > 4) During the check for dependencies problems, I stop as soon as I find an > error; would it be enough? It's a bit awkwardly phrased the way you have it. I would suggest something like: ERROR: constraints on permanent tables may reference only permanent tables HINT: constraint %s -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
