On 11 May 2011 12:06, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > > Why do you wan't to use a boolean directly if you can't use it as the type > itself anyway? > > Yep, and this is a really good point :) I wanted to have consistent api, so use true when I have a boolean value. I will use 'true' and add some info on that to the procedure documentation.
regards Szymon
