On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 11:05 PM, Noah Misch <n...@leadboat.com> wrote: > Incidentally, I used the term "local lock" because I assumed fast-path locks > would still go through the lock manager far enough to populate the local lock > table. But there may be no reason to do so.
Oh, good point. I think we probably WOULD need to update the local lock lock hash table. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
