On May 18, 2011, at 2:47 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote: > I don't see why it couldn't, at least for a fair number of > extensions.. It does require the ability to differentiate between > patch releases and feature releases, though, which I believe is > currently missing in pgxn (correct me if i'm wrong), but that's a > solvable problem, no?
PGXN requires semantic versions. If authors use the correctly, then you can rely on the z in x.y.z to be a patch/bug fix release, and the y and z to indicate new features. > Also, if it has several extensions, it should generate several DEB's - > assuming they're independent extensions, right? If so, where's the > problem? Maybe they're not independent. But why is that a problem. There are a *lot* of DEBs with multiple Perl modules in them. Best, David -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
