On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 1:43 AM, Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rash...@gmail.com> wrote: > Doh! I forgot one important piece of this algorithm - it is necessary > to initialise the result to something non-zero at the start so that > adding leading nulls to an array changes the final result.
Looks reasonable. I believe, however, that applying this will invalidate the contents of any hash indexes on array types that anyone has built using 9.1beta1. Do we need to do something about that? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
