Excerpts from Dimitri Fontaine's message of lun jun 06 15:12:54 -0400 2011:
> So, to the question “do we want hard deadlines?” I think the answer is > “no”, to “do we need hard deadlines?”, my answer is still “no”, and to > the question “does this very change should be considered this late?” my > answer is yes. > > Because it really changes the game for PostgreSQL users. Maybe so, but the problem is that the patch is really WIP at this point and it obviously still needs a lot of work, judging from the patch author's comments. I note that if 2nd Quadrant is interested in having a game-changing platform without having to wait a full year for 9.2, they can obviously distribute a modified version of Postgres that integrates Robert's patch. -- Álvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
