Alex Hunsaker <bada...@gmail.com> writes: > So I've been delaying moving some production boxes over to 9.0.4 from > 2011-06-08 11:41:03 MDT [6078]: [1-1] user= FATAL: terminating > walreceiver process due to administrator command > [ repeats... ]
> I suppose the next step is to narrow it down to a specific flag -O2 > uses... But I thought I would post here first-- maybe someone else has > hit this? Or maybe someone has a bright idea on how to narrow this > down? Maybe using a "prerelease" gcc version isn't such a hot idea for production. It's very, very, very difficult to see how the behavior you describe isn't a compiler bug. (Well, I could also believe that something external is repeatedly hitting the walreceiver with a SIGTERM, but it's hard to square that with the behavior changing when you recompile with different -O levels ...) It might be useful to strace the postmaster and walreceiver processes just to see if any signal is actually being sent or received. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers