Robert Haas wrote: > On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > > Can someone explain why pg_stat_activity has a column named procpid and > > not simply pid? ?'pid' is that pg_locks uses, and 'procpid' is redundant > > (proc-process-id). ?A mistake? > > Well, we refer to the slots that backends use as "procs" (really > PGPROC), so I'm guessing that this was intended to mean "the pid > associated with the proc". It might not be the greatest name but I > can't see changing it now.
Agreed. Just pointing out this mistake slipped through. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
