Thanks... and sorry for sending it to hackers list... I had not read the bug reporting guides... nor the release notes... it seems.
Again, thanks. On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 9:22 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda <acam...@verlet.org> writes: >> Postgres 9.0.4 and postgres9.1beta1 give different line of error numbers on >> functions that raise runtime errors (it seems). > > This is not a bug. See the release notes: > > Adjust PL/pgSQL's error line numbering code to be consistent > with other PLs (Pavel Stehule) > > Previously, PL/pgSQL would ignore (not count) an empty line at > the start of the function body. Since this was inconsistent with > all other languages, the special case was removed. > > regards, tom lane > -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
