On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 06:40, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Joe Abbate <j...@freedomcircle.com> writes: >> No, it doesn't trash anything. The branch is just an additional >> "pointer" to 'master' (at that point in time). I recommend taking a >> look at this: > >> http://progit.org/book/ch3-5.html > > Yes, I was reading exactly that before posting. It talks about pushing > a branch you've created locally, and it talks about what happens when > others pull that down, and it's about as clear as mud w/r/t how the > original pusher sees the remote branch. What I want is to end up > with my local branch tracking the remote branch in the same way as if > I'd not been the branch creator. Preferably without having to do > anything as ugly as delete the branch, or re-clone, or manually hack > config files. This has got to be a use case that the git authors > have heard of before...
I think you need the -u parameter to "git push". (Haven't tested, though) -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
