Thomas, > So, a question: should I list all features in the same table, with > the > comment field indicating if something is not (yet) supported, or > should > I split the features into two tables for supported and unsupported > features? The former keeps all of the information together if someone > is > looking something up by feature, and the latter reduces the number of > required comments and makes it easier to see the complete list of > supported features.
Can't we put the list in a database and generate both? <grin> Seriously, I vote for 2 lists. -Josh ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
