On ons, 2011-06-15 at 22:19 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > (FWIW, I've come around to liking the idea of using =~ and the obvious > variants of that for regex operators, mainly because of the Perl > precedent.)
Maybe I'm not completely up to date on this, but I observe that Perl itself doesn't appear to have a commutator for =~ . -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
