On 15.06.2011 19:10, Kevin Grittner wrote:
There is one issue you raised in this post:
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/4def3194.6030...@enterprisedb.com
Robert questioned whether it should be 9.1 material here:
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/BANLkTint2i2fHDTdr=Xq3K=yrxegovg...@mail.gmail.com
I posted a patch here:
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/4defb169020000250003e...@gw.wicourts.gov
Should I put that patch into a 9.2 CF?
Yeah. I've added it to the September commitfest.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
