On 06/17/2011 10:20 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
alvherre=# \doS ~
Listado de operadores
Esquema | Nombre | Tipo arg izq | Tipo arg der | Tipo resultado |
Descripción
------------+--------+--------------+--------------+----------------+--------------------------------------------
...
pg_catalog | ~ | text | text | boolean | matches
regular expression, case-sensitive
Note that there's no way to tell which is the regex here. It'd be a lot
better if the description was explicit about it. (Or, alternatively,
use a different data type for regexes than plain text ... but that has
been in the Todo list for years ...)
+1 for improving the description.
Have ~ keep its existing semantics, use ~= for the commutator? There
are a lot more chars allowed in operator names anyway, it doesn't seem
to me like we need to limit ourselves to ~, = and @.
Yeah, maybe something like ~< for the commutator. (I know, we're
bikeshedding somewhat.)
I *do* like the idea of having commutate-ability for ANY/ALL, having
needed it a couple of times in the past.
Indeed. me too.
cheers
andrew
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
