On 18 June 2011 13:43, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> wrote: > Is this really a WIP patch? I'm playing a bit with it currently, seems > fairly sane. >
In this case, the WIP designation is meant to convey "warning: only casual testing has beeen done". I tried it out with various permutations of pg_hba.conf, and it worked as advertised in those tests, but I have not made any attempt to formulate a more rigorous testing regimen. In particular I haven't tested that the more exotic authentication methods still work properly, and I can't recall whether I tested recursive file inclusion and group membership. Is that a wrongful use of the WIP designation? Cheers, BJ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
