On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 2:33 AM, Jeff Davis <pg...@j-davis.com> wrote: > On Sun, 2011-06-19 at 21:29 +0200, Florian Pflug wrote: >> If I'm not mistaken about this, that would imply that we also cannot >> have two range types with the same base type, the same opclass, >> but different collations. Which seems rather unfortunate... In fact, >> if that's true, maybe restricing range types to the database collation >> would be best... > > Yes, we cannot have two range types with the same base type. That is a > consequence of the polymorphic type system, which needs to be able to > determine the range type given the base type.
Boy, that's an unfortunate limitation. :-( -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
