Greg Smith <g...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > The idea that any of this will run automatically is a dream at > this point, so saying you want to automatically recover from > problems with the mechanism that doesn't even exist yet is a bit > premature. Well, I certainly didn't mean it to be a reason not to move forward with development -- I wouldn't have raised the issue had you not said this upthread: > I don't see how sequential scan vs. index costing will be any > different on a fresh system than it is now. All I was saying is: I do; here's how... Carry on. -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
