On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 1:49 PM, David E. Wheeler <da...@kineticode.com> wrote:
> Hackers,
>
> I'm curious about behavior such as this:
>
> bric=# select generate_series('2011-05-31'::timestamp ,
> '2012-04-01'::timestamp, '1 month');
> generate_series
> ---------------------
> 2011-05-31 00:00:00
> 2011-06-30 00:00:00
> 2011-07-30 00:00:00
> 2011-08-30 00:00:00
> 2011-09-30 00:00:00
> 2011-10-30 00:00:00
> 2011-11-30 00:00:00
> 2011-12-30 00:00:00
> 2012-01-30 00:00:00
> 2012-02-29 00:00:00
> 2012-03-29 00:00:00
>
> It seems to me that this is subject to interpretation. If I was building a
> calendaring app, for example, I might rather that the results were:
>
> generate_series
> ---------------------
> 2011-05-31 00:00:00
> 2011-06-30 00:00:00
> 2011-07-31 00:00:00
> 2011-08-31 00:00:00
> 2011-09-30 00:00:00
> 2011-10-31 00:00:00
> 2011-11-30 00:00:00
> 2011-12-31 00:00:00
> 2012-01-31 00:00:00
> 2012-02-29 00:00:00
> 2012-03-31 00:00:00
>
> Is there some way to change the interpretation of interval calculation like
> this? Or would I just have to write my own function to do it the way I want?
It's not hugely difficult to get something pretty appropriate:
emp@localhost-> select generate_series('2011-06-01'::timestamp ,
'2012-04-01'::timestamp, '1 month')- '1 day' ::interval;
?column?
---------------------
2011-05-31 00:00:00
2011-06-30 00:00:00
2011-07-31 00:00:00
2011-08-31 00:00:00
2011-09-30 00:00:00
2011-10-31 00:00:00
2011-11-30 00:00:00
2011-12-31 00:00:00
2012-01-31 00:00:00
2012-02-29 00:00:00
2012-03-31 00:00:00
(11 rows)
That's more or less a bit of "cleverness." But it's not so grossly
clever as to seem too terribly frightful.
--
When confronted by a difficult problem, solve it by reducing it to the
question, "How would the Lone Ranger handle this?"
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
