On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 11:02 PM, Jeff Davis <pg...@j-davis.com> wrote: > It's still not out of the question, but I thought that the intermediate > type would be a less-intrusive alternative (and Robert seemed concerned > about how intrusive it was).
I'm no great fan of our existing type system, and I'm not opposed to trying to improve it. However, I'm a bit wary of the theory that we can just tweak X, Y, or Z and then everything will go more smoothly for range types. I fear that there will be knock-on consequences that we'll spend a lot of time either (a) arguing about or (b) fixing. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
