On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 16:30, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 19:45, Alvaro Herrera > <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> wrote: >> Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mar jun 28 10:39:22 -0400 2011: >> >>> I think it would be sensible to block branch removal, as there's >>> basically never a scenario where we'd do that during current usage. >>> I'm not excited about blocking branch addition, although I worry >>> sooner or later somebody will accidentally push a private development >>> branch :-(. Is it possible to block only removal and not addition? >> >> If we can tweak the thing, how about we only allow creating branches >> that match a certain pattern, say ^REL_\d+_\d+_STABLE$? > > I've put this in place - except I used ^REL\d+... and not what you > suggested, since that's how we name our branches :P > > I'm going to push an actual valid branch, let's say 9.7, and then > remove it again, just to make sure things worked (with it installed I > cannot push an invalid branch, so i can't test the branch removal > block). So don't panic if you see that one :)
Ok, I'm done experimenting and this is now in production. -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
