On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> writes: >> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 1:34 AM, Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> wrote: >>> My preference would be to have: >>> >>> # REPLICATION >>> >>> # - Master Settings - >>> # these settings affect the master role in replication >>> # they will be ignored on the standby >>> >>> ... settings ... >>> >>> # - Standby Settings - >>> # these settings affect the standby role in replication >>> # they will be ignored on the master >>> >>> ... settings ... >>> >>> >>> That's how I've been setting up the file for my customers; it's fairly >>> clear and understandable. > >> Looks better than it's now. Anyway, if you change those, you would >> need to change also the config_group in guc.c. > > OK, so the plan is to move these settings into a separate top-level > group "Replication", and sub-divide into master and standby settings, > removing the current classification for "streaming" versus > "synchronous"? That makes sense to me too, but it touches code as > well as docs ... last call for objections ...
None here. +1. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
