On Jul 12, 2011, at 4:46 AM, Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote: > On fre, 2011-07-08 at 22:27 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 1:45 AM, Ashutosh Bapat >> <ashutosh.ba...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >>> I think, tab1 and tab2 are too common names, for anyone to pick up for the >>> tables. Also, the test alter_table.sql is dropping many other tables (even >>> those which have undergone renaming), then why not these two? >> >> Beats me, but I don't see any particular value to changing it. > > It has occurred to me a few times that it could be useful to clarify the > approach here. If we could somehow have a separable cleanup step for > every test, and eliminate interdependencies between tests, we could more > easily support a number of uses cases such as creating a completely > populated regression test database for playing, or running tests in > random order or in differently parallelized scenarios.
True. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
