On Jul 12, 2011, at 12:02 PM, Jeff Davis <pg...@j-davis.com> wrote: > Yeah, I think you're right here. It's probably not much of a practical > concern. > > I was slightly bothered because it seemed a little unpredictable. But it > seems very minor, and if we wanted to fix it later I think we could.
Yes, I agree. I think there are a number of things we could possibly fine-tune, but it's not clear to me just yet which ones are really problems or what the right solutions are. I think once the basic patch is in and people start beating on it we'll get a better feeling for which parts can benefit from further engineering. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
