On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Heikki Linnakangas < heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> Ok, committed this now. > Thank you. > I decided to rename the childoffnum field to "downlinkoffnum". I figured > it'd be dangerous that the field means something subtly different in > different versions, if we need to backpatch bug fixes that use that field. Yes, it seems very reasonable. ------ With best regards, Alexander Korotkov.
