On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 9:24 PM, Heikki Linnakangas < heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> That was a quite off-the-cuff remark, so I took the patch and culled out > loaded-tree bookkeeping. A lot of other changes fell off from that, so it > took me quite some time to get it working again, but here it is. This is a > *lot* smaller patch, although that's partly explained by the fact that I > left out some features: prefetching and the neighbor relocation code is > gone. > > I'm pretty exhausted by this, so I just wanted to send this out without > further analysis. Let me know if you have questions on the approach taken. > I'm also not sure how this performs compared to your latest patch, I haven't > done any performance testing. Feel free to use this as is, or as a source of > inspiration :-). I also was going to try to evade keeping loaded-tree hash. This might help me a lot. Thanks. ------ With best regards, Alexander Korotkov.
