On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:35, Dimitri Fontaine <dimi...@2ndquadrant.fr> wrote: > Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes: >> Note that the progress indicator will *always* count wrong when you >> choose to include WAL, since we just don't know how much WAL there >> should be. I guess in this case we could just advance the "end >> counter" as well as we go, making sure it doesn't shoot above 100%. >> >> Does that seem reasonable? > > Yes. If you're interested into the progress being made and the goal is > moving, it's better to know about that.
Done and applied. -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
