"David E. Wheeler" <da...@kineticode.com> writes: > On Aug 23, 2011, at 8:31 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >> Having done that, we'd mark all the standard "trusted" PLs as dba_create, >> expand the existing definition scripts for the PL extensions so that they >> fully specify the languages and their support functions (transferring all >> that knowledge from the current contents of pg_pltemplate), and then >> remove pg_pltemplate.
> What about untrusted languages? Untrusted languages would still need to be installed by superusers. At least, that's the policy enforced by the current contents of pg_pltemplate, and I wasn't planning to question it. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers