On 27 August 2011 14:14, Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote:
> On lör, 2011-08-27 at 12:29 +0100, Dean Rasheed wrote:
>> So Robert and Merlin both expressed concerns that the existing
>> datetime string parsing code is so complicated that adding to it would
>> likely just introduce more bugs.
>>
>> My first thought was 'how hard can it be?' - famous last words :-)
>
> Maybe you can find an existing Perl or Python module that has already
> implemented this. Then the solution might be 5 lines of wrapping this
> into a PostgreSQL function.
>
Ah now that's an interesting idea.
Python's dateutil module seems to come highly recommended, although I
don't find this too encouraging:
>>> dateutil.parser.parse('today', fuzzy=True)
datetime.datetime(2011, 8, 27, 0, 0)
>>> dateutil.parser.parse('tomorrow', fuzzy=True)
datetime.datetime(2011, 8, 27, 0, 0)
>>> dateutil.parser.parse('foobar', fuzzy=True)
datetime.datetime(2011, 8, 27, 0, 0)
Still, there might be something better out there...
Cheers,
Dean
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
