On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 9:12 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Andy Colson <a...@squeakycode.net> wrote: >>> This patch: >>> >>> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=605 >>> >>> Seems to have been after thoughts, and back burner stuff, and forgotten >>> about... >>> >>> Has it already been commit? >>> >>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2011-07/msg00206.php >>> >>> Oh, wait, nevermind, it was revoked and reworked: >>> >>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-07/msg01041.php >>> >>> but that was posted Jul 19, 2011. And the Patch linked from commitfest is >>> Jun 6, 2011. So is that an old patch? Or a new patch? >>> >>> I'm confused. > >> As far as I can see, Simon stated that he would revert it but never did so. > >> Perhaps we should go do that... > > The patch is definitely still in the tree. Given the dangling-pointer > concerns raised by Heikki, I think we had better revert it before > shipping 9.1. Also, the entry in the September commitfest can be marked > "returned with feedback", since it clearly predates the discussion on > -hackers.
It's not a 9.1 patch, so that is not a concern. I'm back now and will act as advertised. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
