On 7 September 2011 11:56, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 2:44 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 5:22 AM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> > wrote: > >> Fujii - the original goal here was to avoid having a unexplained > >> disconnection in the logs. The only way to do this cleanly is to have > >> a disconnection reason passed to the walsender, rather than just a > >> blind signal. Looks like we need to multiplex or other mechanism. > > > > That's an idea. But what about the patch that I proposed before? > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-08/msg00816.php > > Thanks for that. Committed. > <http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers> > This appears to be the patch submitted to the commitfest. https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=630 Can this now be marked as committed? -- Thom Brown Twitter: @darkixion IRC (freenode): dark_ixion Registered Linux user: #516935 EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
