Joe Abbate <j...@freedomcircle.com> writes: > If a basic operator family is created, e.g., > create operator family of1 using btree; > shouldn't pg_dump include this in its output? If not, why?
Quoting from the pg_dump source code: * We want to dump the opfamily only if (1) it contains "loose" operators * or functions, or (2) it contains an opclass with a different name or * owner. Otherwise it's sufficient to let it be created during creation * of the contained opclass, and not dumping it improves portability of * the dump. I guess if it contains no opclasses and no operators either, this code won't dump it, but isn't it rather useless in such a case? regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers