On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 23:48, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Also, the way yours is set up, I'm dubious that it > does the right thing when the last '0' specifier is to the left of the > decimal point.
When the last '0' is left of the decimal point, Num->zero_end is set to 0, so the branch dealing with that is never executed. > I'm currently testing this patch: Looks good to me. It's potentially less efficient, but I'm not worried about that. Regards, Marti -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
