On 09/11/2011 10:32 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
* Andrew Dunstan ([email protected]) wrote:Address problem where superusers are assumed to be members of all groups http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-04/msg00337.phpThis turns out to be a one-liner.I really don't know that I agree with removing this, to be honest.. I haven't got time at the moment to really discuss it, but at the very least, not being able to 'set role' to any user when postgres would be REALLY annoying..
It's NOT changing that. All this affects is how +groupname is treated in pg_hba.conf, i.e. do we treat every superuser there as being a member of every group.
cheers andrew -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
