On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 7:53 AM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > This patch splits bgwriter into 2 processes: checkpointer and > bgwriter, seeking to avoid contentious changes. Additional changes are > expected in this release to build upon these changes for both new > processes, though this patch stands on its own as both a performance > vehicle and in some ways a refcatoring to simplify the code.
I like this idea to simplify the code. How much performance gain can we expect by this patch? > Current patch has a bug at shutdown I've not located yet, but seems > likely is a simple error. That is mainly because for personal reasons > I've not been able to work on the patch recently. I expect to be able > to fix that later in the CF. You seem to have forgotten to include checkpointor.c and .h in the patch. Regards, -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
