On fre, 2011-09-16 at 10:57 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > So it looks like it behooves us to cater for oom_score_adj in the > future. The simplest, least risky change that I can think of is to > copy-and-paste the relevant #ifdef code block in fork_process.c. > If we do that, then it would be up to the packager whether to #define > LINUX_OOM_ADJ or LINUX_OOM_SCORE_ADJ or both depending on the behavior > he wants.
There are lots of reasons why that won't work: backports, forward ports, derivatives, custom kernels, distribution upgrades, virtual hosting. ISTM that we could at least query the currently used kernel version. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
