> The point I'm trying to make is that it seems like this discussion is > getting driven entirely by the standby case, without remembering that > recovery.conf was originally designed for, and is still used in, > a significantly different use-case. Maybe we had better take two > steps back and think about the implications for the archive-recovery > case.
I think we should take that into consideration, sure. But it should not be in the driver's seat for things like nomenclature. Far more people use replication than use PITR. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
