On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Kevin Grittner <kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov> wrote: > Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > >> - Its impossible to emulate proper locking yourself because >> locking is not allowed for sequences > >> Any arguments against allowing it again? It seems to have been >> allowed in prehistoric times. > > It would be nice to allow it. I've had to create a dummy table just > to use for locking a sequence (by convention).
another (better?) way is advisory locks... merlin -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
