On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: >> This is a marvellous win, a huge gain from a small, isolated and >> easily tested change. By far the smallest amount of additional code to >> sorting we will have added and yet one of the best gains. > > I think you forgot your cheerleader uniform.
LOL. I'm happy whoever and whenever we get large wins like that. Go Postgres! > A patch along these lines > is not going to be small, isolated, easily maintained, nor beneficial > for any but a small number of predetermined datatypes. That was the starting premise. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
