2011/9/23 Cédric Villemain <cedric.villemain.deb...@gmail.com>: > 2011/9/23 Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com>: >> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Agreed. Attached is the updated version of the patch. It adds two options >>> --replication and --no-replication. If neither specified, neither >>> REPLICATION >>> nor NOREPLICATION is specified in CREATE ROLE, i.e., in this case, >>> replication privilege is granted to only superuser. >> >> Committed. Do we need to make any changes in interactive mode, when >> we prompt? In theory this could be either wanted or not wanted for >> either superusers or non-superusers, but I'm not really sure it's >> worth it, and I certainly don't want the command to go into >> interactive mode just because neither --replication nor >> --no-replication was specified. >> >> Thoughts? > > I believe the intereactive mode is useless. > > There is still an issue with the patch for the documentation: a > superuser, even with NOREPLICATION is allowed to perform > pg_start_backup() and pg_stop_backup().
noise, sorry I've just read the commited patch which fixed that. > > >> >> -- >> Robert Haas >> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com >> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company >> > > > > -- > Cédric Villemain +33 (0)6 20 30 22 52 > http://2ndQuadrant.fr/ > PostgreSQL: Support 24x7 - Développement, Expertise et Formation > -- Cédric Villemain +33 (0)6 20 30 22 52 http://2ndQuadrant.fr/ PostgreSQL: Support 24x7 - Développement, Expertise et Formation -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
