On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 1:28 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> The thing that makes me doubt that is this comment from Tatsuo Ishii: >> TI> COPY explicitly specifies the encoding (to be UTF-8 in this case). So >> TI> I think we should not regard U+FEFF as "BOM" in COPY, rather we should >> TI> regard U+FEFF as "ZERO WIDTH NO-BREAK SPACE". > > Yeah, that's a reasonable argument for rejecting the patch altogether.
Yeah, or for making the behavior optional. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
