I like this idea
+1 Il giorno 02/ott/2011 12:56, "Robert Haas" <robertmh...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 10:11 PM, Euler Taveira de Oliveira > <eu...@timbira.com> wrote: >> On 01-10-2011 17:44, Daniel Farina wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 9:30 PM, Tom Lane<t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>>> >>>> ISTM it would be reasonably non-controversial to allow users to issue >>>> pg_cancel_backend against other sessions logged in as the same userID. >>>> The question is whether to go further than that, and if so how much. >>> >>> In *every* case -- and there are many -- where we've had people >>> express pain, this would have sufficed. >>> >> I see. What about passing this decision to DBA? I mean a GUC >> can_cancel_session = user, dbowner (default is '' -- only superuser). You >> can select one or both options. This GUC can only be changed by superuser. > > Or how about making it a grantable database-level privilege? > > -- > Robert Haas > EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com > The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company > > -- > Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
