On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 5:33 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >>> On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Sorry, but I still don't really think it's fair to say that you've >>>> proposed a solution to this problem. Or if you have, neither I nor >>>> Fujii Masao understand that proposal well enough to decide whether we >>>> like it. >>> >>> Arguing between trenches doesn't really get us anywhere. >>> >>> As ever, when someone claims to have a better solution then it is up >>> to them to prove that is the case. >> >> So... are you going to do that? > > Simon, could you? If your proposal turns out to be better than mine, I'd be > happy to agree to drop my patch and adopt yours.
Yes, will do. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
