On 5 October 2011 12:29, Alex Hunsaker <bada...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 00:30, Alex Hunsaker <bada...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 23:46, Amit Khandekar
>> <amit.khande...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>
>>> You mean the final changes in plperl_helpers.h would look like
>>> something like this right? :
>>>
>>> static inline char *
>>> utf_u2e(const char *utf8_str, size_t len)
>>> {
>>> char *ret = (char *) pg_do_encoding_conversion((unsigned
>>> char *) utf8_str, len, PG_UTF8, GetDatabaseEncoding());
>>>
>>> if (ret == utf8_str)
>>> + {
>>> + if (GetDatabaseEncoding() == PG_UTF8 ||
>>> + GetDatabaseEncoding() == PG_SQL_ASCII)
>>> + {
>>> + pg_verify_mbstr_len(PG_UTF8, utf8_str, len, false);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> ret = pstrdup(ret);
>>> + }
>>> return ret;
>>> }
>>
>
>>> Yeah I am ok with that. It's just an additional check besides (ret ==
>>> utf8_str) to know if we really require validation.
>
> Find it attached. [ Note I didn't put the check inside the if (ret ==
> utf8_str) as it seemed a bit cleaner (indentation wise) to have it
> outside ]
I have no more issues with the patch.
Thanks!
-Amit
>
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
